🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has stated to have scraped a vast number of tracks from Spotify and is getting ready to release them online.

Possible Impetus for AI Development

Observers noted the apparent leak could boost artificial intelligence firms looking for material to train their technology.

A group known as Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as performer and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not represent its full catalog.

“We have identified and disabled the malicious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” stated a Spotify representative.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorized access identified a third party scraped public metadata and employed questionable tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Stated Goal and Concerns

The streaming service does not think the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of sharing large digital files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would likely be utilized for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated material is sadly widespread in the AI industry, so this accessed music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a huge online repository of pirated books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its systems.

A founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that members of the public could in theory “build their own private free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive added it could also allow technology firms to “educate models on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has become a battleground between creatives, writers and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, creative professionals have protested against a government suggestion to allow AI companies use protected work without permission unless the owner signals. Virtually every respondent to a government call for evidence on the proposal has backed artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for science, innovation and development told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.